← BACK
Aruba Sign
2018->2022
Digital Signature App
Italy
Aruba Sign processes millions of legally binding digital signatures a year. The challenge was making a security-heavy, regulation-driven process feel navigable — without removing the controls that professionals actually rely on.
The users ranged from occasional signers to professionals handling dozens of documents a day. Both groups needed speed and predictability — the old interface served neither well.
My role: Lead UX Designer — sole designer on a cross-functional team, driving a complete app redesign over 4 years, from initial research through to release and continuous iteration.

The Challenge

The old version of Aruba Sign — software for certified digital signatures — had high support costs and could no longer scale to accommodate new features required by eIDAS, the European regulator in this field.
A complete redesign was needed: one that could handle regulatory complexity without burdening users with it, and that could grow with future requirements without accumulating technical and UX debt.

Research & Discovery

I created a survey to understand user needs, how often they use the software, and which of the 5 main features they use the most: signing, verification, timestamping, encryption, and decryption. I also ran a competitor analysis in Italy and other countries, examining the most common desktop patterns across various applications.

Insights

  • Goal Signing dominates usage

    Users primarily use the signing feature, with some also using verification, while the other features — timestamping, encryption, decryption — are rarely used.

  • Puzzle Two conflicting user patterns

    Two main personas emerged: users who sign one document at a time, and those who perform batch signatures. The existing drag-and-drop pattern served neither well, creating friction for both.

  • Design Broken previews & hidden settings

    The graphical signature feature did not display previews correctly, making selection difficult. Application preferences were buried and hard to discover, causing repeated support requests.

The Idea & Flow

I produced sketches and wireframes, tested with internal stakeholders using Adobe XD. I created two different types of homepages and two distinct methods for applying graphical signatures, allowing us to test which approach better matches user expectations before committing to high-fidelity work.
PROBLEMS RESEARCH IDEATION TESTING SOLUTION PROBLEMS RESEARCH IDEATION TESTING SOLUTION

Testing & Iteration

I tested the proposed solutions with real users on prototypes. By iterating the process, I conducted further user testing with the main beta version of the app, refining each flow before release.

Testing Insights

  • New UI immediately clear

    Users found the new UI extremely clear and easily located everything they needed without guidance, confirming the IA restructure had worked.

  • Secondary features now discoverable

    Features beyond signing became easy to find on their own. Tab-based navigation felt intuitive — no more support calls asking where preferences were hidden.

  • Graphical signature preview fixed

    The correct rendering meant users could finally see exactly what they'd get before applying. First-attempt success rate went up noticeably across test sessions.

Results & Impact

Six months after launch, the numbers were clear. Ongoing surveys track user satisfaction and pain points, feeding directly into each roadmap cycle.
-80%
Product support tickets plummeted within 6 months of the new release.
1.5M+
Overall app downloads
4.5
CSAT